I was talking with AKB in the chat tonight and he pointed me in your direction, since you created the Daedric Font and the Dragon Font. – Robin Hood (talk) 17:14, 18 January 2015 (GMT) Falmer TrueType Font Biffa ( talk) 17:12, 18 January 2015 (GMT) When I made the edits, I just answered the question you asked without really thinking about what I was doing, but yes, a collapsible collapsed table is often the better way to go for those things. I'm sure I'll use the other show/hide|start on other occasions. Biffa ( talk) 09:50, 18 January 2015 (GMT) Cheers for the help, but I've actually gone for a collapsible collapsed table that I saw on the help page on this occasion. – Robin Hood (talk) 03:03, 18 January 2015 (GMT) Thank you so much, it was melting my brain trying to work it out. Looking at the various template categories can help you discover what templates we have, though we could probably stand to do a little bit of reorganizing there. As far as the coding goes, we have Help:Templates and Help:Tables, Wikipedia has various Help pages, plus there's the documentation on each of our template pages. Would it be possible to implement the lore links for template. – Dragon Guard (talk) 15:34, 1 January 2015 (GMT) NPC Template In addition to what Damon said, it's safe to assume that just about any staff member or prominent user reads the Admin Noticeboard and Community Portal, and that if they have input, they'll give it. It's a waste of his time and your time petitioning to him for every trivial matter on your mind.- damon talk ♥ contribs 01:23, 30 December 2014 (GMT) Prodding RH70 every time you have an issue you disagree with won't help you, and RH70's opinion can't (and won't) be your saving grace to every disagreement you have with the other users of the community. ![]() In fact, administrators don't need to reply period, and without Legoless or RH70's opinion on the matter, a discussion can still create the desired result. Administrator opinions are no more valid than the opinion of the common user, and unless it's disciplinary, which this discussion isn't, then a second administrator doesn't have to reply. Thanks! :) – Dragon Guard (talk) 00:58, 30 December 2014 (GMT) I'll just be blunt. Only ONE admin has registered opinions on the matter. Please please please could you take a look at this discussion that I would like some input about- UESPWiki:Community_Portal#Second-hand_forum_confirmations_by_Gstaff_-_sufficiently_reliable_OOG_for_lore.3F.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |